
![]() |
Edward Lowton
Editor |
![]() ![]() |
Home> | Handling and Storing | >Lift trucks & ancillaries | >Thorough examination: Survey shows confusion |
ARTICLE
Thorough examination: Survey shows confusion
25 January 2013
A survey by Consolidated Fork Truck Services among companies owning and operating fork lift trucks has found that most Thorough Examinations do not meet user expectations.Many are confused by what exactly is included an

A survey by Consolidated Fork Truck
Services among companies owning
and operating fork lift trucks has
found that most Thorough
Examinations do not meet user
expectations.Many are confused by
what exactly is included and who is
responsible for making sure a truck
conforms to legal requirements.
Most respondents (93%) incorrectly assumed that Thorough Examination would automatically include an inspection of their truck's brakes.
According to Simon Emery, chair of CFTS, the nub of the problem is that the inspection of fork lift trucks is governed by two separate pieces of legislation: Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998 (PUWER 98) and Lifting Operations and Lifting Equipment Regulations 1998 (LOLER 98).
Emery comments: "An alarming number of inspectors only include those items covered by LOLER - such as mast, chains and forks - within their inspection. They totally ignore areas such as overhead guards, steering, brakes and other vital components." It was to overcome this situation that the British Industrial Truck Association (BITA) and the Fork Lift Truck Association (FLTA), with the support of the HSE, joined forces to create a single, national procedure available to truck users.
The result is a comprehensive procedure and strict code of practice, a programme of engineer and management training and the mechanism to monitor standards under the CFTS brand.
Companies accredited to the scheme (about 400) can be identified via the 'kite' certification mark.
Most respondents (93%) incorrectly assumed that Thorough Examination would automatically include an inspection of their truck's brakes.
According to Simon Emery, chair of CFTS, the nub of the problem is that the inspection of fork lift trucks is governed by two separate pieces of legislation: Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998 (PUWER 98) and Lifting Operations and Lifting Equipment Regulations 1998 (LOLER 98).
Emery comments: "An alarming number of inspectors only include those items covered by LOLER - such as mast, chains and forks - within their inspection. They totally ignore areas such as overhead guards, steering, brakes and other vital components." It was to overcome this situation that the British Industrial Truck Association (BITA) and the Fork Lift Truck Association (FLTA), with the support of the HSE, joined forces to create a single, national procedure available to truck users.
The result is a comprehensive procedure and strict code of practice, a programme of engineer and management training and the mechanism to monitor standards under the CFTS brand.
Companies accredited to the scheme (about 400) can be identified via the 'kite' certification mark.
MORE FROM THIS COMPANY
- CFTS to share key insights at IMHX 2022
- Lift trucks: Examine, report, repair
- You've got LOLER but don't forget PUWER
- CFTS experts on hand
- Short term hire: Short term risk?
- Importance of thorough examination
- The benefits of a Thorough Examination
- Truly local service from CFTS
- Don't neglect fork extensions
- CFTS delivers 'Practical 3-Point Plan’ to materials handling equipment users
OTHER ARTICLES IN THIS SECTION